Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1990No. 89-1193PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Claiming that the trial court should have sustained his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a bedroom he was temporarily occupying in a friend’s home, James D. Walker appeals his conviction for illegal possession of methamphetamine.

We affirm the finding of the district court for Douglas County that the evidence upon which Walker was convicted was legally seized.

In determining the correctness of a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, the Supreme Court will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless those findings are clearly wrong. State v. Prahin, 235 Neb. 409, 455 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. State v. AbdouchNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PrahinNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BlakelyNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. KonfrstNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State of Iowa v. Christopher D. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State v. CodyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CortisNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. IlligNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API