Legal Opinion

Stumne v. Village Sports & Gas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1976No. 45919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury or, in the alternative, for a new trial on grounds that the verdict was not justified by the evidence.

After school on March 23,1971, plaintiff Debra Stumne stopped at Village Sports & Gas to purchase gas for her father’s car. An employee, John McCullough, pumped the gas and then asked Debra if she wanted to ride in one of the all-terrain vehicles which defendant had on sale. The two of them got into the vehicle and started to move in a route designed to take them in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Radke v. BrenonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Hestad v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Austin v. RoseckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Bakke v. Rainbow Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Obst v. Microtron, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Pouliot v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Berry v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API