Legal Opinion

People v. Munoz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapozzoli, J.

Neither suspicious, nor equivocal behavior alone, justifies a search (People v. Brown, 24 N Y 2d 421; People v. Corrado, 22 N Y 2d 308), and the fact that defendant was actually in possession of narcotics does not change the illegal search into a legal one, because a search is bad or good when it starts and it is not made good by what is found. It clearly appears in this record that the defendant was not under arrest when the plastic bag was produced from the defendant’s waistband and, therefore, the search cannot be defended as an incident to a lawful arrest. The cases cited in the dissent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. People v. TowndrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. GoingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. People v. OcasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. AlbaNew York Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API