Legal Opinion

Sterner v. Nixon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

This is a condemnation case. The question requiring decision is whether a landowner is entitled to have a jury determine the necessity, and cost, for such elements as a sidewalk, fence, curbing and embankment, i. e., “putting land in shape to meet the changed condition of the highway,” in fixing his present and prospective damages when a part of his tract of land is taken by the state for highway purposes.

The facts which give rise to this question are these: Respondent Dr. Warford L. PFixon was the owner of a rectangular lot with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Packard v. Bergen Neck Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  3. White v. Inhabitants of FoxboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Braidburn Realty Corp. v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  5. Green v. Town of IrvingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. SpeareNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. PUBLIC SERVICE ELEC. & GAS v. OldwickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. Application of the City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. Bd. of Ed. of ElizabethNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API