Trimmier v. Valley Falls Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before SeasE, J., Spartanburg, August, 1909. Action by T. R. Trimmier and S. F. Sutton against Valley Falls Mfg. Co. et al. From order refusing temporary injunction, plaintiffs appeal.
Read the full summary
Before SeasE, J., Spartanburg, August, 1909. Action by T. R. Trimmier and S. F. Sutton against Valley Falls Mfg. Co. et al. From order refusing temporary injunction, plaintiffs appeal. Judgment creditors should have been restrained from enforcing their judgments: 51 S. C., 433; 63 S. C., 361; 69 S. C., 159, 551; 75 S. C., 220. cites: Order is not appealable: 48 S. C., 315. Judge may consider merits in deciding if temporary injunction should be granted: 34 S. C„ 345; 36 S. C., 562; 52 S. C., 36; 60 S. C., 559. Temporary injunction properly refused: High on Rec., secs. 18, 89, 289, 292, 295,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order, refusing a motion for a temporary injunction.
The grounds of appeal are as follows: “Because, it is respectfully submitted, his Honor, Judge Sease, erred in holding ‘as to the accounts, claims and judgments held by Saxe Gotha Mills and Lexington Manufacturing Company, I am fully convinced that the said companies are bona fide holders of such claims, accounts and judgments, holding the judgments as collateral, and there is no possible reason why the Court should be asked to interfere with the property so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allen v. CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- South Carolina & Georgia R. R. v. East Shore Terminal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897