Legal Opinion

Ford v. Reilly

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2001No. 2000-CA-00739-SCTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Mamie Warnack Dunn died testate owning three disputed certificates of deposit, with Sara W. Reilly listed as joint owner. Tana Harwood Ford and Virginia Harwood Crist, heirs under Dunn’s will, contested the petition to close Dunn’s estate, arguing that pursuant to Dunn’s last will and testament, they were jointly entitled to fifty percent of the three disputed certificates of deposit. The Lincoln County Chancery Court ruled that pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 81-5-63 (1996), Reilly alone took the three disputed certificates of deposit by right of survivorship…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullins v. RatcliffMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cooper v. CrabbMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Madden v. RhodesMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Norris v. NorrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Murray v. LairdMississippi Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Will of DunnMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API