Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1910No. 436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The information and complaint charge the offense in practically the same language, the charging part of both pleadings being as follows, after setting out the date and venue, that Mike Cassidy "without having first applied for and obtained a license under the laws of the State of Texas, as a retail liquor dealer, did then and there unlawfully in a certain locality in said county and State where local option was not then and there in force, sell directly and indirectly to one C. A. Peabody spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication, in quantities of one…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. State v. Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Trezevant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API