Legal Opinion

In Re Fotomat Franchisee Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 4, 1975No. 204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM * , EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

This litigation is comprised of five actions pending in three different districts : three in the Western District of Missouri, one in the Southern District of Indiana and one in the Southern District of California. Plaintiffs in each action are franchisees of the Fotomat Corporation and allege that Fotomat, the sole defendant, violated the federal antitrust laws in the course of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Photocopy PaperUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
  2. In Re Trucking Industry Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Asbestos & Asbestos Insulation Material Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  2. In Re Asbestos & Asbestos Insulation Material, Etc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  3. In Re Dow Chemical Co. "Polystyrene Foam" Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API