In Re Fotomat Franchisee Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM * , EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
This litigation is comprised of five actions pending in three different districts : three in the Western District of Missouri, one in the Southern District of Indiana and one in the Southern District of California. Plaintiffs in each action are franchisees of the Fotomat Corporation and allege that Fotomat, the sole defendant, violated the federal antitrust laws in the course of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Photocopy PaperUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Trucking Industry Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Asbestos & Asbestos Insulation Material Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Asbestos & Asbestos Insulation Material, Etc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Dow Chemical Co. "Polystyrene Foam" Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977