Legal Opinion

Norfrey v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1976No. 1-476A64PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, C.J.

Defendant-appellant, John Rick Norfrey (Norfrey), brings this appeal from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, Ind. Rules of Procedure, Post-Conviction Remedy Rule 1 (PCR. 1), wherein he contended that his guilty plea to a charge of robbery was not knowingly and intelligently entered.

We reverse and remand.

The essence of this appeal is the contention that the trial court did not comply with the provisions of IC 1971, 35-4.1-1-3 (Burns Code Ed.) and that, as a consequence, the trial court was entitled neither to presume the guilty plea was knowingly and intelligently entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Emert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fraley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Garcia v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Howard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barfell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Ewing v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Snowe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Kindred v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API