Legal Opinion

J. D. & A. B. Spreckels Co. v. the Takaoka Maru

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 4, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

There are two motions:

1. By the respondent (a) for a stay of all proceedings pending the duration of the World War, and (b) to vacate a notice for the taking of the testimony at Philadelphia, Pa., on February 5, 1942, of Ray B. Garrison and other witnesses residing in or near that City.

2. By the libelant for a Writ of Foreign Attachment.

The libel was filed on September 5, 1939, and jurisdiction was acquired by the personal appearance of the respondent, which is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Empire of Japan, then having a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Spellman v. SullivianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Birdsall v. Germain Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  4. Green v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock Co. v. Pacific Ruler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Geismar v. BellamyNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API