Sovich v. Loewn

In rendering its opinion the court stated that the answers to questions 1, 3, and 5 (being those involving the defendant’s negligence as to speed, lookout, and control) are contrary to the convincing force of the evidence and ought not to stand. This court has by a long line of cases firmly adopted the rule that the jury’s verdict should not be disturbed where there is credible evidence to support it. Powell v. Ashland I. & S. Co. 98 Wis. 35, 73 N. W. 573; Peat v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co. 128 Wis. 86, 107 N. W. 355; McKnelly v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen, 160 Wis. 514, 152 N. W. 169; Bannon…