Legal Opinion
Mamallis v. Millbourne Borough
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 10, 1960No. Appeals, 205 and 206PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Eagen,
This involves two interrelated mandamus actions tried in the court below without a jury. From judgments in favor of the defendants, these appeals are prosecuted.
At some time (the exact date not appearing of record) in December 1955, Nicholas Mamallis, plaintiff-appellant in each of these consolidated appeals, was appointed “acting captain” of the police force of the Borough of Millbourne. He continued in that capacity until the spring of 1957, at which time he was officially sworn in as “captain.” As captain, he received an annual salary of $5200. Patrolmen on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manning v. Millbourne Borough Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Carey v. AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Scaccia v. Old Forge BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Miners S. Bank v. Duryea BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Falkinburg v. Venango TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Township of Haverford v. SpicaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Holtz WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kennedy v. Upper Milford Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- West Penn Administration, Inc. v. Union National Bank of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.