Legal Opinion

Rudisill v. Cross

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from Clark Circuit Court. Rufus D. Hearn, Judge. There was no consideration 'for the so-called second contract. Rap. & Law. Law Die., “ Consideration.” Appellee was liable, under sec. 3654, Mansf. Dig., without any contract. 1. When the fence was built, appellee became the owner of one-half of it, which he sold to appellant for what he owed appellant for building it. This was a good and valuable consideration. Mansf.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from Clark Circuit Court. Rufus D. Hearn, Judge. There was no consideration 'for the so-called second contract. Rap. & Law. Law Die., “ Consideration.” Appellee was liable, under sec. 3654, Mansf. Dig., without any contract. 1. When the fence was built, appellee became the owner of one-half of it, which he sold to appellant for what he owed appellant for building it. This was a good and valuable consideration. Mansf. Dig., sec. 1673; 31 Ark., 631; 27 id., 407; 33 id., 97. ^ 2. Sec. 3654, Mansf. Dig., only means that a party joining shall pay half the expense of keeping up the joint…

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The appellant sued the appellee in the court of a justice of the peace for half the cost of a partition fence, and recovered judgment for $18.47, from which appellee prosecuted an appeal to the circuit court, where judgment was rendered in his favor, from which the appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The parties agreed to build a partition picket fence between their town lots. Appellant built the entire fence, and appellee refused to pay for half the entire fence, contending that he was to pay for half of that part only of the fence used by him. Appellee had joined his fence to the partition…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hicks Bros. v. Swift Creek Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. Tsuboi v. CohnIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kuhn v. PooleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Meadors v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Morgan v. LandstreetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API