Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Munro

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Grove, J.) Bill to enjoin the sale of land on execution. Defendants Munro and Neenan appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The defendants Munro and Neenam are judgment creditors of one Thomas B. Haynes. Execution was issued upon the judgment, and placed in the hands of defendant McQueen, who was sheriff of Kent county. He levied upon the land here in controversy. Complainant thereupon filed his bill to enjoin the sale of the land, and decree was rendered in his favor.

He alleges in his bill that "he is the .legal and equitable owner of the land; that the entire N. E. ¿ of the N. W-i of section 17, township 10 N., of range 10 W., was formerly owned by the City Bank of Battle Creek; that prior to May 28, 1885, he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shafter v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Putnam v. TinklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Barnes v. GroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Barras v. BarrasMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tiffany v. TiffanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API