Legal Opinion

Protest 998179-G of Fred. Haslam & Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided November 20, 1946No. 51423Published

1Opinion of the Court

*221Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the trial the plaintiff moved in evidence, without objection, two memorandums signed by the assistant appraiser at New York, the truth of the contents of which was agreed to by counsel for the Government. It appeared therefrom that as to the merchandise classified at 40 percent under paragraph 923, it consists of bougies and catheters in chief value of gum, similar to that covered by Bard v. United States (T. D. 49189) and Bard v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 134), therein held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558; that as to the merchandise…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C. R. Bard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API