United States v. Gottlieb
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 107 S.Ct. 2875, 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987), defendants Irving L. Gottlieb (“Gottlieb”) and J. Howard Segal (“Segal”) filed motions to vacate their respective convictions under the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The mail fraud statute contains two elements: the existence of a scheme to defraud and the use of the mails in furtherance of that scheme. See 18 U.S.C. § 1341. In McNally, the Supreme Court held that the mail fraud statute applies only to alleged…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. John Allan CrawleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- United States v. Allegheny Bottling Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994