Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Clarridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 26, 2000, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was not totally unemployed during the period in question and he made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Roland [Sweeney], 239 AD2d 694; Matter of Leban [Sweeney], 233 AD2d 738, lv denied 89 NY2d 811). The record establishes that claimant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SilversteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API