United States v. Allegra
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge
Defendant Robert Allegra (“Allegra”) has moved to suppress- all statements he made during a post-arrest interview on March 25,- 2015 after allegedly invoking his right to counsel. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 469-73, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The Government counters that Allegra did not unambiguously invoke his right to counsel in a way that required its agents to stop questioning him. I grant Allegra’s motion to suppress for the reasons stated below.
I
Allegra is a licensed pilot who owns an aviation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allegra v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- United States v. NaikDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020