Legal Opinion

S.H. v. B.L.H.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1990No. 859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order modifying custody of a minor child, A.H.. The parties to this action, appellant, B.L.H., and appellee, S.H., are the natural father and mother respectively of A.H. Appellant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in restricting appellant’s contact with A.H. to limited periods of visitation subject to supervision by members of appellee’s family; and (2) whether this case should be remanded to the trial court for additional testimony regarding the report and opinion of Ms. Maddi Jane Sobel, an investigator…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Lombardo v. LombardoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Marine Bank v. HuhtaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MARY D. v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bishop v. PillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. MARY D. v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Palcsey v. Palcsey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2000
  5. Sh v. BlhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API