S.H. v. B.L.H.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order modifying custody of a minor child, A.H.. The parties to this action, appellant, B.L.H., and appellee, S.H., are the natural father and mother respectively of A.H. Appellant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in restricting appellant’s contact with A.H. to limited periods of visitation subject to supervision by members of appellee’s family; and (2) whether this case should be remanded to the trial court for additional testimony regarding the report and opinion of Ms. Maddi Jane Sobel, an investigator…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lombardo v. LombardoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Marine Bank v. HuhtaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MARY D. v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Bishop v. PillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- MARY D. v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Palcsey v. Palcsey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2000
- Sh v. BlhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990