Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1996No. C2-94-2469Published

1Opinion of the Court

548 N.W.2d 260 (1996)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Peter Dean PAUL, Appellant.

No. C2-94-2469.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 23, 1996.

Richard L. Swanson, Chaska, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Scott Joint Prosecution Ass'n, Lisa A. Skoog, Patrick Ciliberto, Shakopee, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellant Peter Dean Paul was arrested at his home in Jordan, Minnesota, and charged with the misdemeanor offense of driving under the influence of alcohol. At the omnibus hearing, Paul pleaded not guilty to…

Also in this document: Dissent · Tomljanovich; Dissent · Gardebring; Dissent · Page.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API