Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank of Georgia v. Namik

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 24, 2004No. A03A2198, A03A2199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

In these cases, we are asked to decide whether Wachovia Bank of Georgia breached its fiduciary duties as trustee by causing an estate to pay what the estate contends were unnecessary and avoidable estate taxes. Following a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the Bank on counts alleging breach of fiduciary duty as administrator, self-dealing as trustee, stubborn litigiousness, tort, and punitive damages. The trial court found in favor of Issam Namik, Suzan Namik, Jinan Namik, Sundus Namik, and Hadia Mahmoud (collectively “Namik”) on counts alleging breach of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. American Cyanamid Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Ocmulgee Fields, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Robbins v. National Bank of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Perling v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A. v. NamikCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Namik v. Wachovia Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API