Burrows v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrett, Presiding Judge
Although I agree with my colleagues that the appellant cannot now be charged with the death of the unborn child, I cannot agree with their treatment of several other issues in this case. As I have stated in previous cases (See Assadollah v. State, 682 P.2d 1215 (Okl.Cr.1981), Brett, P. J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part, and Hall v. State, 635 P.2d 618 (Okl.Cr.1981), Brett, P. J., Dissenting) I do not believe that the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979), can be so lightly brushed aside. However it is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Western Insurance Co. v. BrochnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.