Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leigh Gomer v. Altha/Ann Steinlage, Donald Davis and Ruby Davis

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 18, 2013No. 01-11-00829-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJim Sharp, Justice

Leigh Gomer sued Donald and Ruby Davis and Ann Steinlage (collectively, “ap-pellees”), for conversion of the purebred poodle Gomer contends she received as a gift from Jane Artall, Donald Davis’s mother. In two issues, Gomer contends that (1) the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict in favor of appellees be*482cause she presented legally sufficient evidence that she owned the dog and (2) the trial court erroneously imposed $5,000 in sanctions against Gomer and her attorney for bringing a frivolous suit. Although the majority vacates the imposition of sanctions, it affirms the directed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dorman v. Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  4. Edwards v. Pena, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  5. Woodworth v. Cortez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API