Moore v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with petitioner that the determination finding him guilty of violating inmate rule 103.20 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [4] [ii] [unauthorized soliciting]) based on his possession of materials published by the Amfrican Freedom Communion (AFC) is not supported by substantial evidence (see generally, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130,139). There is no proof that he was involved in the solicitation of members *906for that organization. We therefore modify the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rowe v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Battiste v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weaken v. Deputy Superintendent BishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003