Legal Opinion

Moore v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with petitioner that the determination finding him guilty of violating inmate rule 103.20 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [4] [ii] [unauthorized soliciting]) based on his possession of materials published by the Amfrican Freedom Communion (AFC) is not supported by substantial evidence (see generally, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130,139). There is no proof that he was involved in the solicitation of members *906for that organization. We therefore modify the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rowe v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Battiste v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weaken v. Deputy Superintendent BishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API