Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1941No. 29945Published

1Per curiam

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted this action against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover an alleged balance due under a written contract of employment. Verdict was directed for plaintiff for a sum less than that claimed. Defendant appeals, and the plaintiff cross-appeals.

The plaintiff alleged in his second amended petition that he had performed certain work as a driller under a written contract whereby he was to be paid partly in cash and partly out of oil which might be produced from the well on which he was performing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Briggs v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Stevens v. SharpeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Stuart v. First National Bank of ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Motor Mortgage Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API