Legal Opinion

Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Cobb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

Section 5 of chapter 715 of the Laws of 1921 contains the limits of the power and authority of such Commission so far as material here and reads as follows: “ The Commission shall cause to be promptly examined every motion-picture film submitted to it as herein required, and unless such film or a part thereof is obscene, indecent, immoral, inhuman, sacrilegious, or is of such a character that its exhibition would tend to corrupt morals or incite to crime, shall issue a license therefor.’^)

The pictures to which the "provisions of section 5 are applicable are those which come under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. People Ex Rel. Doyle v. . AtwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. MATTER OF JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Pratter v. LascoffNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Foy Productions, Ltd. v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API