Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Cobb
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, J.:
Section 5 of chapter 715 of the Laws of 1921 contains the limits of the power and authority of such Commission so far as material here and reads as follows: “ The Commission shall cause to be promptly examined every motion-picture film submitted to it as herein required, and unless such film or a part thereof is obscene, indecent, immoral, inhuman, sacrilegious, or is of such a character that its exhibition would tend to corrupt morals or incite to crime, shall issue a license therefor.’^)
The pictures to which the "provisions of section 5 are applicable are those which come under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- People Ex Rel. Doyle v. . AtwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by13 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- MATTER OF JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Pratter v. LascoffNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Foy Productions, Ltd. v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.