Legal Opinion

In re Aaron

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application to modify decree, refusing probate to papers propounded as decedent’s will.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

Pending a controversy in this court over the claim to probate of two papers, each of which had been propounded as solely constituting this decedent’s last will and testament, his son, Charles E. Aaron, who had appeared in the proceeding as a party contestant, was appointed temporary administrator of the estate, and entered at once upon the duties of' that office.

The proceeding resulted, on November 25th, 1885, in a decree which adjudged that neither of the papers aforesaid was entitled to probate. That decree contained the following provisions:

“It is ordered” . . . “that Charles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. New York & Erie Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Riegelman v. RiegelmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1880
  3. Everitt v. CarmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1880
  4. Walsh v. WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Suydam's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API