Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Banks v. Pitocchelli

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

Fabrizio Pitocchelli, prior to November 27,1928, was engaged in a so called private banking business under G. L. c. 169, and subject to the supervision of the commissioner of banks. On that date, on proceedings begun by the commissioner, a receiver was appointed. G. L. c. 169, §11.

On February 5, 1929, it was ordered by a single justice of this court that no claimant shall be entitled to share in the distribution of the assets of Fabrizio Pitocchelli in the hands of the receiver unless he shall present to the receiver on or before June 1, 1929, legal proof of his claim; this proof was to state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Mershon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Watson v. SilsbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. United States v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Suffolk Knitting Mills v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farinha v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Foley v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Rosenberg v. GarfinkelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Kellogg v. Wolcott, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API