Legal Opinion

Holdsworth v. Hague

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 24, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This case is before ns on the return to an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of a permit by the respondents to the relators for the erection of a building on Sip avenue in Jersey City.

The proposed structure is a building in similitude of a dining car, erected, however, on permanent foundations.

It is admitted that the application for the permit is in due form, and that no present legal objection exists to the construction 'of such a building, but it is urged that the respondents are engaged in making a survey of the city with the view to the adoption of a zoning…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Butvinik v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campana v. Clark Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API