Legal Opinion
New Bank of New England v. Tritek Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 27, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-10061-WFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
The defendants in this case have moved for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative for transfer. The plaintiff has moved for the substitution of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as a party. Magistrate Alexander, after thorough review of the jurisdictional issues presented, recommended on December 2, 1991 that the case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No objections were filed by the plaintiff within the 10 day period. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
The defendants’ motions to dismiss (# 13,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thurston v. PageDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- S/N1 Reo Ltd. Liability Co. v. City of New London Ex Rel. BallestriniDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. McCoyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1997
- Ostrander v. City of ManchesterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- RESTORE v. U.S. Dep't InteriorDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.