Legal Opinion

Tp Orthodontics, Inc. v. Kesling

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2013No. 46A03-1207-MI-324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

In 2010, three sibling shareholders, Christopher, Adam, and Emily Kesling (“the siblings”), filed suit against their brother, Andrew Kesling, on behalf of the family business, TP Orthodontics (“TPO”). *1059In response, TPO’s board of directors established a special litigation committee to determine whether to pursue the siblings’ derivative claims against Andrew, the president of TPO. After an investigation, the committee issued a written report in which it recommended pursuing some of the siblings’ claims but not others. If a special litigation committee rejects…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. In Re Perrigo CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. KeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. TP Orthodontics, Inc., Christopher Kesling, DDS, MS, Adam Kesling, and Emily Kesling v. Andrew Kesling, Individually and as Trustee of the Andrew C. Kesling Trust Dated March 28, 2001Indiana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API