Legal Opinion

Larry Medlin Scroggs v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 19, 2010No. 07-07-0458-CR, 07-07-0454-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES T. CAMPBELL, Justice.

The motions for rehearing of appellants Larry Scroggs and Alana Gariepy are denied. We withdraw our opinion and judgments of February 23, 2010, and substitute the following.

In these two cases, appellants were indicted for the offenses of aggravated kidnapping 1 and two counts of burglary of a habitation. 2 They were tried together, and convicted of the indicted offenses by a jury which assessed probated sentences and fines as punishment. Appellants challenge their convictions and sentences through seven identical issues.

We will reverse and render judgment…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Damian Lamon Murkledove v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  2. Alejandro Reyes v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
  3. Anthony Prescott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
  4. Charles Ruth Iii v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  5. Charles Ruth Iii v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API