Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1978No. CR 77-16, CA 7852PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction following a jury trial for burglary in the second degree, disorderly conduct, carrying a dangerous weapon with intent to use, and unauthorized use of a vehicle. His principal assignments of error concern the court’s failure to give one of his requested instructions and the court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial.

Defendant requested that the jury be given an instruction on the crime of menacing on the grounds that it was a lesser included offense of carrying a dangerous weapon with intent to use. In State v. Washington, 273 Or 829, 835-36, 543 P2d 1058…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Drew Ryser v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  2. State v. VivianoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. HeintzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Creasey v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API