Legal Opinion
United States v. Ross
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1953No. 4609PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
An indictment containing 82 counts was returned against Ross and Tager in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. Each count charged that the defendants ‘“did knowingly deposit for mailing at Van Nuys, California, for delivery in the District of Kansas,” an envelope containing nonmailable material, as defined in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1461. The trial court dismissed the indictment on the ground that the venue was improperly laid in Kansas and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the offenses charged,
18 U.S.C.A. § 1461 defines nonmailable matter and further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ackley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. StrewlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. ConradU.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Samuel Gold, Howard Guy Halbett, John Frank Fusco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. LurosDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1965
- United States v. John Thomas Price, William Hollis PriceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Alessandro Moncini, Aka: Sandro MonciniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.