Legal Opinion
Tjepkes v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1935No. 30,157PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Appeal from an order striking certain portions of defendant’s answer as sham and frivolous.
The action is one ex delicto to recover damages for defendant’s alleged failure and neglect to act within a reasonable time upon an application of plaintiff for a policy of hail insurance. Plaintiff, a farmer residing in Olmsted county, on June 8, 1933, at the instance and request of an agent of defendant, made application for hail insurance upon his crops during that season in the sum of $1,300, and executed and delivered to the agent a promissory note for the premium. He…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schliep v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Gleason v. Duluth Nest No. 1200 Order of OwlsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Zayc v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Rasmussen v. Prudential Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Den Mar Construction Co. v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.