Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. Mullen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1954No. 32795Published

1DissentFinley, J.

(dissenting)—The complaint, tested herein by demurrer, alleges that the defendant doctor performed surgery upon the plaintiff on February 1, 1946; that he did not exercise, in plaintiff’s case, the reasonable and ordinary care and diligence ordinarily exercised by physicians and surgeons in the city of Seattle; that he negligently failed to exercise reasonable and ordinary care and diligence in applying the skill and learning of the ordinary physicians and surgeons practicing in Seattle; that he negligently and carelessly left a surgical sponge in plaintiff’s body for a period of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Crossett Health Center v. CroswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Burton v. TribbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API