Legal Opinion

Brandt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1936No. 17809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, JUDGE.

The offense is a robbery conviction; five years in the penitentiary.

On original submission of this case we declined to consider appellant’s bills of exception and statement of facts because it appeared that the same were not filed within the time prescribed by law, and no fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. Since then the appellant has convinced us by an affidavit and a certificate of the trial court that the delay in filing the same was not due to any want of diligence on his part. Therefore we will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Norsworthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Funston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. State v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API