Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Grosnicklaus

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for- Holt county. Tried below before Tiffany, J.

1Opinion of the CourtEeese, J.

This is a proceeding in error to the district court of Holt county.

The first question presented for decision is as to the alleged error of the district court in its ruling upon a demurrer to the petition of defendant in error, who was plaintiff below.. The petition is as follows :

“ 1st. The plaintiff for cause of action states the facts to be that on the 13th of May, 1881, he purchased-, and thereby became the owner of, the northeast quarter of section thirty-two (32), township twenty-nine (29), range eleven (11) west sixth principal meridian, in Holt county, Nebraska.
“ 2d. That, at the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Savage v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Etten v. MedlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Charman v. CharmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sloan v. HallowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Welsh v. BurrNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hanks v. HanksWyoming Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API