Legal Opinion

Richmond Hosiery Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1928No. 5352PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, a Georgia corporation, engaged in manufacturing hosiery, had mills at Rossville, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn. In 1908 it adopted and copyrighted the trade-mark ‘ ‘ Wunder-hose” for certain of its products made at the Chattanooga mill and from the latter part of that 'year until the early part of 1914 it carried on an extensive campaign advertising ‘ ‘ Wunderhose, ’ ’ and expended $223,749.77 for 'that purpose. Petitioner employed a number of traveling salesmen to sell its products. These men ostens'ively sold two lines of hosiery, one under the name of the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marko Durovic v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. E. H. Sheldon & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  3. Houston Natural Gas Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. WH Hill Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  5. Harden M. Loan Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API