Legal Opinion

Cluse v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 2010No. 09-574PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOKS, Judge.

|,FACTS

James Patrick Cluse d/b/a J.P. Cluse Construction (Cluse) traded in a 2001 Ka-matsu bulldozer for a 2003 bulldozer with H & E Equipment Services, Inc. (H & E) on October 9, 2006. Cluse’s dealings with H & E began in June 2006 when he brought his 2001 dozer to H & E’s shop in Maurice, Louisiana, to diagnose a problem. At that time Cluse met H & E’s salesman, Brent Broussard (Broussard), and told him the 2001 dozer was in the shop for transmission repair. On July 26, 2006, H & E advised Cluse that it believed the 2001 dozer needed approximately twenty-six thousand dollars…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. Sassone v. ElderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BaileyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
  2. Eads v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Hardesty v. Waterworks District No. 4 of Ward FourDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2013
  4. Arnaud v. DiesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Sloan v. MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API