Legal Opinion

Sorter v. Austen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1930No. 8 Div. 144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

An inquisition of lunacy under the statute is a proceeding sui generis, partaking of the nature of a civil action, and is an adversary proceeding. 32 C. J. 627, § 164; 14 R. C. L. 560, § 11.

But such a proceeding is not a suit within the meaning of section 7222 of the Code of 1923, which requires a party filing a new suit after a dismissal or nonsuit, to pay the costs of the former suit. Hinton v. Brewer, 129 Ga. 232, 58 S. E. 708; 32 C. J. 627-8, § 164.

The statute, Code 1923, § 8107, regulating the impaneling of the jury in such inquisition proceedings, provides that, “if any of the jurors…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Braham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Bachelor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. O'Rear v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. South v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Russaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API