Sorter v. Austen
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
An inquisition of lunacy under the statute is a proceeding sui generis, partaking of the nature of a civil action, and is an adversary proceeding. 32 C. J. 627, § 164; 14 R. C. L. 560, § 11.
But such a proceeding is not a suit within the meaning of section 7222 of the Code of 1923, which requires a party filing a new suit after a dismissal or nonsuit, to pay the costs of the former suit. Hinton v. Brewer, 129 Ga. 232, 58 S. E. 708; 32 C. J. 627-8, § 164.
The statute, Code 1923, § 8107, regulating the impaneling of the jury in such inquisition proceedings, provides that, “if any of the jurors…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Braham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Bachelor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- O'Rear v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- South v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Russaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.