McDaniel v. Holland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Ralph E- Campbell, Judge. Ejectment by Robert L. Holland against William H. McDaniel and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error, and plaintiff also brings error to so much of the judgment as related to the damages.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This is an action of ejectment by Holland, hereafter called plaintiff, to recover the possession of the S. E. % of tire N. E. and the E. % of the S. W. % of the N. E. % of section 16, township 28 N., range 14 E., state of Oklahoma, and damages, from William H. McDaniel and the Paraffine Oil Company, hereafter called defendants. The plaintiff recovered judgment for the possession of the demanded premises and damages for the detention thereof. The defendants sued out -a writ of error from this judgment. The plaintiff also sued out a writ of error from the judgment so far…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Goat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hutchison v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Edmison v. CrutsingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Heffner v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gilcrease v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.