Legal Opinion · Dissent

Trans-Western Express, Ltd. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 11, 1994No. 93SA271Published

1DissentChief Justice Rovira

The majority concludes that the Public Utilities Commission of Colorado (PUC) did not announce “a new evidentiary standard that forecloses the testimony of a single shipper to establish public need” and therefore, it reasons that “the sole issue is whether substantial evidence in the record supports the ALJ’s findings.” Maj. op. at 356. In so doing, the majority refuses to come to grips with Trans-Western Express, Ltd’s (TWX) argument that the decisions of the ALJ and PUC are arbitrary and capricious. Maj. op. at 355 n. 9.

I agree with the majority that the PUC did not announce a new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller Bros., Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Morey v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Morey v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Dupre Transport v. Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Pollard Contracting Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API