Legal Opinion

Grant v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from tbe County Court of Milwaukee County. Tbis court having ordered a continuance of tbis cause until tbe next term, on appellant’s motion, tbe respondent now moves to vacate tbat order.

1Opinion of the CourtDixoN, C. J.

Tbis cause was continued until tbe next term upon affidavit and motion made ex parte by counsel for tbe appellant, tbe insurance company, on tbe ground tbat tbe appeal was not perfected and return made to tbis court eight days before tbe commencement of tbe present term, so tbat tbe cause was not properly noticed for argument at tbis term, and was irregularly placed by the clerk upon tbe calendar. Tbe affidavit seeming to establish tbis ground for continuance, and it being believed tbat there could be no mistake or dispute about tbe facts, tbe motion was granted, with leave, however, for tbe…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Aldrich v. Public Opinion Pub. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API