Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State v. E.B.M.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 18, 1997No. 2941031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After Remand from the Supreme Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Aabama. Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. State of Ohio, 718 So.2d 665 (Aa.1996). In its opinion, our Supreme Court clarified its language in Ex parte State of California, 669 So.2d 884 (Ala.1995), and held that pursuant to § 26-17-10(d), Aa.Code 1975, paternity may be established through a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (“URESA”) ac*668tion, § 3ÍM-80 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, as long as the provisions of the Alabama Uniform Parentage Act (“AUPA”),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Clark v. Houston County Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte State of California and MillenderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. State ex rel. E.K.D. v. M.R.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. State ex rel. E.K.D. v. M.R.W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rothenberger v. Cast Products, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Rothenberger v. Cast Products, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. State of Ohio v. E.B.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API