Legal Opinion

Paducah Light & Power Co. v. Parkman's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 2, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*198Opinion op the Couet bt

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The appellant company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling’ electric light and power in Paducah, and maintains a line of poles upon which its wires are strung. The Paducah Home Telephone Company operates a system of telephones in Paducah, and at 28th and Jefferson Streets the wires of the telephone Company are attached to the pole upon which the light and power company has it wires. At this point the wires of the telephone company are only a few inches from those of the light and power company.

In January, 1913, the deceased,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WoodhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Mize v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Lewis' Adm'r v. Bowling Green Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. BeaucondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Nunan v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Dunning v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Gosney v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Woodrum's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API