Legal Opinion

People v. Kahler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Respondent was convicted of selling liquor to a minor. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Respondent was convicted of selling liquor to a minor. In the complaint made to the justice the name of the county was left blank in the venue, but the complaint was made before a justice of the peace in the city of Hillsdale, and alleged the offense to have been committed in that city. Respondent relies upon People v. Gregory, 30 Mich. 371; but in that case there was the further objection that no mention was made of the year in which the .offense was committed. In the later case of People v. Telford, 56 Mich. 541, the Court held that courts take judicial notice of municipalities within their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Turner v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Haskins v. RalstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People v. TelfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. NormanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. PichetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API