Legal Opinion

Estate of Howard v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1990No. 89-70196PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

The estate of Rose D. Howard (the petitioner) brought suit in the Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiencies set out by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner). The Tax Court gave judgment for the petitioner. 91 T.C. 329 (1988). The Commissioner appeals. This case requires the construction of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 2056(b)(7). Although the issue is narrow, there has been considerable interest in the case among tax practitioners and estate planners. We reverse the Tax Court.

FACTS

The facts, as stipulated by the parties, are as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. White v. AronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Estate of Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Butka v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of Shelfer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Estate of Cavenaugh v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Estate of Cavenaugh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. Estate of Shelfer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  5. Frederick J. Tedori, Robin j.tedori v. Order and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API