Legal Opinion
State v. Floyd
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 14, 1978No. 2 CA-CR 1334, 2 CA-CR 1335-2PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
Mark C. Floyd appeals from his conviction of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, hashish, and from the resulting revocation of probation and sentence in an earlier case. He questions the classification of hashish as a narcotic drug, failure to suppress the hashish as the product of an illegal search, certain evidentiary rulings, the prosecutor’s jury argument, and the sufficiency of the evidence. We will address his contentions in that order.
Recognizing that classification of hashish as a narcotic drug under A.R.S. § 36-1001 was approved in State v. Bollander,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Francisco S.A. Ignacio and Antonio S.A. Ignacio v. People of the Territory of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Juan Andres Sotelo Martinez, United States of America v. Randolph Stephens AKA Randolph Sidle (True Name)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. VALASQUEZSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- State v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. EchevarrietaUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CrumleyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.