Legal Opinion

Collins v. State of Alaska

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 30, 1985No. C84-418VPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOORHEES, District Judge.

Having considered the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment and the motion of defendant for summary judgment, together with the memoranda, affidavits, and exhibits submitted by counsel, and, having heard and considered the oral argument of counsel, the Court now finds and rules as follows:

1. This case, which is apparently one of first impression, involves a conflict between two strong public policies, one upholding collective bargaining, the other protecting the rights of seamen. At issue is whether a provision in a labor contract can foreclose plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Anderson v. Alaska Packers Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Alaska Industrial Board v. Alaska Packers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Timothy J. Collins v. State of Alaska and Division of Marine Highway SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API